_biden-asserts-executive-privilege-over-audio-of-interview-with-robert-hur.jpg "Biden Asserts Executive Privilege Over Audio of Interview With Robert Hur from criminal low video com Video Screenshot Preview")
GalleryPlay Video:
(Note: The default playback of the video is HD VERSION. If your browser is buffering the video slowly, please play the REGULAR MP4 VERSION or Open The Video below for better experience. Thank you!)
⏲ Duration: 1:31
👁 View: 111.5M times
✓ Published: 16-May-2024
👁 View: 111.5M times
✓ Published: 16-May-2024
Description:
Biden Asserts Executive Privilege , Over Audio of Interview With Robert Hur.<br/>In February, Hur's yearlong investigation <br/>into whether President Biden mishandled classified documents ended without enough evidence to support criminal charges.<br/>In February, Hur's yearlong investigation <br/>into whether President Biden mishandled classified documents ended without enough evidence to support criminal charges.<br/>House Republicans were provided a <br/>transcript of Biden's interview with Hur, but they wanted the audio, which the DOJ denied.<br/>As a result, House Republicans were <br/>moving to hold Attorney General <br/>Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.<br/>On May 16, the Department of Justice told House Republicans that the president asserted executive privilege over audio from his interview with the special counsel.<br/>The move protects Garland from criminal exposure as GOP lawmakers seek to hold him accountable.<br/>Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte <br/>explained the DOJ's actions in a letter.<br/>The Attorney General must draw a line <br/>that safeguards the Department from <br/>improper political influence and protects <br/>our principles, our law enforcement work, <br/>and the people who carry out that work <br/>independently, without fear or favor, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .<br/>The Committees seek to hold the <br/>Attorney General in contempt <br/>not for failing in his duties, <br/>but for upholding them, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .<br/>With the information you now have, <br/>the Committees ought not to proceed <br/>with contempt and should instead avoid <br/>unnecessary and unwarranted conflict, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .<br/>White House Counsel Ed Siskel also wrote a letter supporting the assertion of executive privilege. .<br/>The absence of a legitimate need <br/>for the audio recordings lays bare <br/>your likely goal—to chop them up, <br/>distort them, and use them for <br/>partisan political purposes, White House Counsel Ed Siskel, via letter
Biden Asserts Executive Privilege , Over Audio of Interview With Robert Hur.<br/>In February, Hur's yearlong investigation <br/>into whether President Biden mishandled classified documents ended without enough evidence to support criminal charges.<br/>In February, Hur's yearlong investigation <br/>into whether President Biden mishandled classified documents ended without enough evidence to support criminal charges.<br/>House Republicans were provided a <br/>transcript of Biden's interview with Hur, but they wanted the audio, which the DOJ denied.<br/>As a result, House Republicans were <br/>moving to hold Attorney General <br/>Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress.<br/>On May 16, the Department of Justice told House Republicans that the president asserted executive privilege over audio from his interview with the special counsel.<br/>The move protects Garland from criminal exposure as GOP lawmakers seek to hold him accountable.<br/>Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte <br/>explained the DOJ's actions in a letter.<br/>The Attorney General must draw a line <br/>that safeguards the Department from <br/>improper political influence and protects <br/>our principles, our law enforcement work, <br/>and the people who carry out that work <br/>independently, without fear or favor, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .<br/>The Committees seek to hold the <br/>Attorney General in contempt <br/>not for failing in his duties, <br/>but for upholding them, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .<br/>With the information you now have, <br/>the Committees ought not to proceed <br/>with contempt and should instead avoid <br/>unnecessary and unwarranted conflict, Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uriarte, via letter .<br/>White House Counsel Ed Siskel also wrote a letter supporting the assertion of executive privilege. .<br/>The absence of a legitimate need <br/>for the audio recordings lays bare <br/>your likely goal—to chop them up, <br/>distort them, and use them for <br/>partisan political purposes, White House Counsel Ed Siskel, via letter
Share with your friends:
Whatsapp | Viber | Telegram | Line | SMS
Email | Twitter | Reddit | Tumblr | Pinterest
_pilot-dies-after-attempting-high-risk-top-gun-stunt-in-fighter-jet.webp "This is the shocking moment a fighter jet bounced off a runway before the pilot ejected and died.Squadron leader Asim Jawad, 32, appeared to be attempting Top Gun style three aileron rolls at low altitude when the fuselage of the Yakovlev Yak-130 scraped along the tarmac. CCTV shows smoke and sparks erupting from the Russian-made jet before Asim pulled up and appeared to be circling the runway in Chattogram, Bangladesh, on May 9.However, the footage shows a sudden explosion before Bangladesh Air Force pilot Asim and his co-pilot Wing Commander Sohan Hasan Khan both ejected.Local media reported that the two pilots both landed in the Karnaphuli River before being rescued by members of the air force, navy and local fishermen.Asim later died in hospital while Sohan remains in critical condition at the Banouja Isa Khan Hospital in Patenga. The aircraft was later recovered from the water.The government's Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said in a statement that the training jet had 'crashed due to a mechanical failure'.They claimed the pilots manoeuvred the aircraft away from the densely populated area near the airport to the sparsely populated area where they crashed.However, CCTV footage of the incident appears to show the crash was caused by the high-risk stunt.A source said: 'The Bangladesh Air Force claimed the crashed YAK 130 fighter jet encountered mechanical failure, resulting in a catastrophic crash in the Patenga area of Chittagong. However, recently obtained CCTV footage from the runway area contradicts this claim by BAF, displaying a chilling sequence where the aircraft attempts to perform three consecutive aileron rolls at a perilously low altitude, nearly colliding with the runway in the process.'The footage reveals the jet scraping the runway at high speed, causing significant damage to the fuselage and igniting a fire. At the 19-second mark, a slowed-down analysis shows fragments of the aircraft detaching as it rebounds and gets airborne.'In the critical moments that followed, as captured in the video, the engine became engulfed in flames, emitting black smoke. The two pilots, demonstrating exceptional skill under pressure, managed to eject from the flaming jet. The ejection, a procedure known to exert enormous g-force on the body, often results in temporary loss of consciousness.'")
_criminal-law-in-4-minutes.webp "What Is Law Even")
_criminal-law-the-crime-of-conspiracy.webp "LawShelf")
_what-is-the-difference-between-civil-cases-and-criminal-cases.webp "LegalYou")
_civil-law-vs-criminal-law-explained.webp "Business Law Institute")
_the-roar-202392-24-season-review-watch-on-shotstv.webp "Sunderland Echo football writers Joe Nicholson and Phil Smith look back on the highs and lows of Sunderland's 2023/24 season in The Roar on www.shotstv.com<br/>Catch it on Freeview channel 276.")
_understand-criminal-law-in-18-minutes-part-i.webp "animateeducate")
_pilot-dies-after-attempting-high-risk-top-gun-stunt-in-fighter-jet.jpg)
_criminal-law-in-4-minutes.jpg)
_criminal-law-the-crime-of-conspiracy.jpg)
_what-is-the-difference-between-civil-cases-and-criminal-cases.jpg)
_civil-law-vs-criminal-law-explained.jpg)
_the-roar-202392-24-season-review-watch-on-shotstv.jpg)
_understand-criminal-law-in-18-minutes-part-i.jpg)
![[+]](/images/menu.gif){kind=small}